Why were the big naval guns so ineffective in WW2? Big naval guns in World War II were often less effective than expected due to several factors:

Improved Aircraft and Missiles:

The rise of air power and guided missiles made naval guns less effective. Aircraft could attack from a distance, and missiles could strike with precision, often making naval guns less relevant in many engagements.

Armor and Damage Control:

Ships were built with increasingly advanced armor and damage control systems. Even direct hits from large naval guns sometimes did not result in decisive damage due to these defenses.

Naval Tactics and Strategies:

The emphasis shifted towards carrier-based warfare, with aircraft carriers becoming the primary offensive and defensive platforms. This shift reduced the role of big naval guns in naval engagements.

Range and Accuracy:

While big naval guns had long ranges, their accuracy over those distances was not always sufficient. The technology for precise targeting and fire control was still developing.

Logistics and Maintenance:

The logistics of supplying and maintaining large-caliber ammunition for big guns was complex and resource-intensive. As naval warfare evolved, the focus shifted to more versatile and easier-to-maintain weapon systems.

Overall, the strategic environment of World War II, with its focus on air and missile technology, changed the role and effectiveness of traditional naval guns.