US high court takes up case of Mexican shot by border watch WASHINGTON
The US Supreme Court concurred Tuesday to survey for the second time a claim over the case of a Mexican teenager shot dead inside Mexico by a Border Patrol Agent discharging from the US side of the outskirts
The family of Sergio Hernandez who was 15 when he was executed by US operator Jesus Mesa on June 7, 2010, has been looking for pay over the demise in a claim
The case has political hugeness in the midst of a flood in undocumented transients crossing the border and President Donald Trump’s call for border authorities to make harder move to discourage them
The case prone to be contended in the fall of this current year or mid 2020 could set a point of reference for different cases of shootings of transients on either side of the border by US authorities
Hernandez and three companions had been playing in the dry riverbed of the Rio Grande that isolates the Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez from its Texan neighbor El Paso
The adolescents were hustling up the solid bank to contact the spiked metal perimeter on the US side of the border and dashing down when Hernandez was shot in the head by Mesa
Plateau later said Hernandez had would not comply with his request to stop the game and had tossed rocks at him The teenager’s family state Hernandez represented no peril
After the Justice Department decided that Mesa had acted inside his obligations Hernandez’s family sued the authority for harms
They contended that US law secures individuals against lopsided utilization of power by law authorization and that Mesa had disregarded Hernandez’s rights under the US constitution
The government locale court in Texas repelled the claim and a provincial interests court bolstered that choice because the injured individual was a Mexican national and kicked the bucket on A mexican area and in this manner had no case of insurance under the US constitution
In 2017 the case went to the Supreme Court which requested the interests court to rehear it thinking about certain legitimate points of reference
The interests court again managed the family had no premise to sue and the family spoke to the high court by and by
This isn’t the main case of its thoughtful The Mexican government affirms that many vagrants or Mexican natives have been executed by US authorities on the border as of late
A comparative claim over a Border Patrol specialist’s 2012 shooting of a multi year old young lady on the Mexican side of the border with Arizona was endorsed a year ago in a different interests court
The administration at that point requested that case to the Supreme Court where it will probably be on hold for a choice in the Hernandez case
