What does one consider the new term trans-female? If it is a lady dissembling to a be a person, fine; that is correct, as it is a feminine World Health Organization is trans.
If on the opposite hand it’s describing a person World Health Organization is dissembling to be a lady, then no, positively not.
Male {and feminine|and feminine} area unit biological classifications; you can’t become male or female, you are one or the opposite counting on your composition and gametes. someone World Health Organization is male cannot become feminine, it’s not possible.
The gender lobby looks to believe that neutering words somehow changes reality. It doesn’t. If you are male, then you were born male and you’ll die male. redaction the lexicon will not amendment that. Biology is maligned and scorned by these individuals permanently reason: it exposes the eccentric falsehoods on that their lives area unit primarily based.
Biology is unaffected by whining, tantrums and proceeding. Get as mad at this answer as you like; once you have calmed down you will still be a person sporting a dress. Words don’t alter reality; if they did my life would have way more Lamborghinis in it than it will currently.
People area unit trans within the same approach some individuals area unit gay; they are born that approach. however that does not offer transgender people license to expect everyone else to abandon biological reality to suit them. Luckily, the bulk of them don’t, but, as is commonly the case, alittle minority spoils things for the bulk.
I’m afraid that dissembling that inconvenient truths do not exist looks to be characteristic of the gender lobby.
